As New Delhi
attempts to walk a diplomatic tightrope, documents seen by Al Jazeera and
company statements suggest Israel is receiving Indian weapons as it wages war
on Gaza.
In the early morning hours of May 15, the cargo vessel Borkum stopped off the Spanish coast, lingering in the waters a short distance from Cartagena. At the port, protesters waved Palestinian flags and called on authorities to inspect the ship based on suspicions that it carried weapons bound for Israel.
Leftist members of
the European Parliament sent a letter to Spanish President Pedro Sánchez
requesting that the ship be prevented from docking. “Allowing a ship loaded
with weapons destined for Israel is to allow the transit of arms to a country
currently under investigation for genocide against the Palestinian
people,” the group of nine MEPs warned.
Before the Spanish
government could take a stand, the Borkum cancelled its planned stopover and
continued to the Slovenian port of Koper. “We were right,” Inigo Errejon, the
spokesperson for the hard-left Sumar party wrote on X, arguing that the
Borkum’s decision to skip Cartagena confirmed the suspicions.
But missed in the
debate over whether the ship ought to be allowed to dock in Spain were the
unlikely origins of the Borkum’s cargo.
According to
documents seen by Al Jazeera, the ship contained explosives loaded in India and
was en route to Israel’s port of Ashdod, some 30km (18 miles) from the Gaza
Strip. Marine tracking sites show it departed Chennai in southeast India on
April 2 and circumnavigated Africa to avoid transiting through the Red Sea,
where Yemen’s Houthis have been attacking vessels in reprisal for Israel’s war.
The identification
codes specified in the documentation, obtained unofficially by the Solidarity
Network Against the Palestinian Occupation (RESCOP), suggest the Borkum
contained 20 tonnes of rocket engines, 12.5 tonnes of rockets with explosive
charges, 1,500kg (3,300 pounds) of explosive substances and 740kg (1,630
pounds) of charges and propellants for cannons.
A paragraph on
confidentiality specified that all employees, consultants or other relevant
parties were mandated that “under no circumstances” were they to name IMI
Systems or Israel. IMI Systems, a defence firm, was bought by Elbit Systems,
Israel’s largest weapons manufacturer, in 2018.
The commercial
manager of the ship, the German company MLB Manfred Lauterjung Befrachtung,
told Al Jazeera in a statement that “the vessel did not load any weapons or any
other cargo for the destination Israel”.
A second cargo ship
that had departed India was denied entry on May 21 to the port of Cartagena.
Spanish newspaper El Pais reported that the Marianne Danica left from India’s
port of Chennai and was en route to Israel’s port of Haifa with a cargo of 27 tonnes
of explosives. Minister of Foreign Affairs Jose Manuel Albares confirmed in a
news conference that the vessel was denied entry on the grounds that it was
shipping military cargo to Israel.
These incidents add
to mounting evidence that weapon parts from India, a country that has long
advocated dialogue over military action in resolving conflicts, are quietly
making their way to Israel, including during the ongoing months-long war
in Gaza. A lack of transparency on India’s transfers helps them slip under
the radar, say analysts.
Zain Hussain, a
researcher at the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI),
told Al Jazeera that “the lack of verifiable information makes it hard to
determine whether transfers have taken place”.
But “collaboration
between India and Israel has been happening for quite a few years now”, Hussain
said, therefore “it’s not unfeasible that we may see some made-in-India
components being used by Israel [in its war on Gaza]”.
‘Made in India’
On June 6, in the
aftermath of Israel’s bombing of a United Nations shelter at the Nuseirat
refugee camp in Gaza, the Quds News Network released a video of the remains of
a missile dropped by Israeli warplanes.
Amid the tangled parts, a label clearly read: “Made in India.”
"Made in India" Reads the label on the remains of a missile dropped by Israeli warplanes at a UN shelter in Nusseirat refugee camp last night. pic.twitter.com/QfmCSLIPLu
— Zakir Hossain Galib (@mohotasin1) April 9, 2025
Hussain, who
researches the transfer of conventional arms at the Stockholm-based think tank,
said the video required further investigation but observed that a large share
of the collaboration between India and Israel is known to revolve around
missile production, in particular the Barak surface-to-air missile.
According to SIPRI,
the Indian company Premier Explosives Limited makes solid propellants – a
significant part of the rocket motors, but not the whole motor – for MRSAM and
LRSAM missiles. These are the Indian designations for Barak medium and
long-range surface-to-air missiles of Israeli design.
The company’s
executive director, T Chowdary, admitted to exporting to Israel amid the
current war in Gaza, during a conference call on March 31. “We have received
the pending revenue from the Israel export order, and this has shown an
exponential jump in the revenue of the quarter,” he told investors, according
to the minutes of the meeting. “We are happy to announce that we have highest
ever quarterly revenue.”
On that occasion,
Chowdary presented Premier Explosives Limited as “the only Indian company which
specialises in the export of fully assembled rocket motor”. In addition, he
said the company had begun manufacturing mines and ammunitions and started
exporting RDX and HMX explosives, commonly used in military weapons systems.
In its January 2024
overview, the company listed exports to Israel in the “defence & space”
sector, which SIPRI deemed likely to include propellants for Barak missiles.
Premier Explosives
did not respond to Al Jazeera’s requests for comment.
According to SIPRI,
the Indian components can be used for Barak missiles that are then also
reexported by Israel.
Indian made UAVs
Yet, India’s
collaboration with Israel goes far beyond rocket propellers.
In December 2018,
Adani Defence & Aerospace – the defence arm of Indian multinational holding
company Adani Enterprises Ltd – and Israel’s Elbit Systems inaugurated the
Adani Elbit Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Complex (UAV) in Hyderabad.
The facility was
presented in a joint statement as “the first outside Israel to manufacture the
Hermes 900 Medium Altitude Long Endurance UAV”, which can fly for up to 36
hours at an altitude of 30,000 feet (9,000 metres).
“The factory shall
start operations with the manufacturing of complete carbon composite
aero-structures for Hermes 900, followed by Hermes 450,” the statement added.
Both drones can be fitted with antitank guided missiles, according to the drone
inventory of the United Kingdom’s leading defence think tank the Royal United
Services Institute (RUSI).
“The production of
Hermes drones is as important for India as it is for Israel,” SIPRI’s Hussain
said. “For Israel, it means they have a factory outside of the country. For
India, it’s about technology transfer, so that it can also produce drones based
on the Israeli model.”
Earlier this year,
India announced its first indigenous medium-altitude long-endurance drone, the
Drishti 10 Starliner, built on the Hermes model.
The factory is
currently producing the UAVs, including for shipment to Israel, according to
SIPRI, but India has not disclosed any information about their transfer.
Israel is known to
be systematically using drones as it wages its war on Gaza, which has killed
more than 37,000 people, most of them women and children. In November, in the
aftermath of Hamas’s attack on October 7, Elbit deputy CEO Joseph Gaspar said
the company had been working “round the clock” to meet demand by Israel’s
military.
The use of Hermes
drones has been documented by Human Rights Watch (HRW) and other organisations
in previous conflicts in Gaza as well. Earlier this month, Lebanon’s Hezbollah
fighters said they shot down an armed Hermes 900 drone in its airspace. Since October,
Israeli strikes on Lebanon have killed more than 400 people, including more
than 70 civilians.
“If we see Hermes
drones being used in Gaza, they’re not necessarily coming from India,” as
Israel also produces them in-house, SIPRI’s Hussein said. But the possibility
that India has begun exporting the drones as per the terms of the agreement and
that they are currently being used against the Palestinian population in the
besieged Strip cannot be ruled out, he added.
Elbit Systems did
not respond to Al Jazeera’s request for comment. The Adani Group, which
includes Adani Defence & Aerospace, told Al Jazeera in a statement that the
company exported a small consignment of UAVs for noncombat operations.
“We reiterate that
these drones are built for surveillance and reconnaissance and cannot be used
for attack roles,” it said. “We categorically deny having exported any UAVs to
Israel since October 7, 2023.”
India’s balancing
act
India has been
pursuing a longstanding balancing act in its relationship with Israel. New
Delhi has attempted to cast itself as a conciliatory actor and a possible
mediator in the conflict in Gaza, calling for peace and supporting calls for a
ceasefire while also demanding that Hamas return captives still held in Gaza.
More broadly,
Indian officials – from Prime Minister Narendra Modi to his Minister of Foreign
Affairs S Jaishankar and the country’s diplomats at the UN – have consistently
argued that the country believes in dialogue and negotiations, not war, as the
only means to resolve conflicts. That has been India’s formal position when it
comes to Russia’s war on Ukraine and Israel’s war on Gaza.
“But reports that
it is supplying Israel with weapons could disrupt that narrative,” Nicolas
Blarel, the author of The Evolution of India’s Israel Policy, told Al Jazeera.
Al Jazeera sought
comments from India’s Ministry of External Affairs and Ministry of Defence on
June 17 and then again on June 21, but has not received a response.
India recognised
the state of Israel in 1950, only two years after its formation, but
established formal diplomatic relations in 1992 after decades of non-aligned
and pro-Arab policy. In 1974, it became the first non-Arab country to accept
the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) as the legitimate representative of
the Palestinian people and recognised the State of Palestine in 1988.
PLO leader Yasser
Arafat used to famously describe former Indian Prime Minister Indira Gandhi as
his “sister”.
In the 1990s, as
the Cold War ended and Arafat engaged with then-Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak
Rabin in a series of talks that culminated in the Oslo Accords, India also
opened up to collaboration with Israel.
“That accelerated
in 1999, with the war between India and Pakistan,” Blarel, who lectures in
International Relations at Leiden University in the Netherlands, said. “Most
countries refused to sell weapons to both countries, except most notably
Israel.”
Since then, Israel
has been willing to engage India on technology transfer to an extent that no
other partner has, providing know-how on drones, electric sensors for border
control and other surveillance systems that are crucial to India along its
tense borders with Pakistan and China, Blarel added.
Indian Prime
Minister Narendra Modi, of the Hindu majoritarian Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP),
veered further from the country’s historic pro-Palestinian stance after he was
elected in 2014.
Modi adopted a more
public embrace of Israel, becoming the first prime minister to travel to the
country in 2017. The strategic partnership that resulted from the visit, which
included areas such as space and technology, softened India’s stance on Israel
to a “case-by-case approach”, where India’s position was no longer guaranteed
to support that of Palestinians”, Blarel said.
Modi has since
repeatedly referred to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as his
“friend”.
The same approach
continues to this day. On October 26, weeks after the Hamas attack and the
beginning of Israel’s reprisal in Gaza, India abstained from a UN General
Assembly (UNGA) vote on a resolution calling for an “immediate, durable and
sustained humanitarian truce”.
External Affairs
Minister S Jaishankar said Indians were “big victims of terrorism” and were
therefore sympathetic to Israel. The resolution, Jaishankar argued echoing
Israel’s position, lacked an “explicit condemnation” of the Hamas attack that
killed 1,139 Israelis.
India later voted
in favour of a UNGA resolution for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza, but in April
abstained from voting for a resolution adopted by the UN Human Rights Council
that called for an arms embargo on Israel in addition to an immediate ceasefire
in Gaza.
Earlier this month,
India joined other members of the BRICS grouping – Brazil, Russia, China, South
Africa, Iran, Egypt, Ethiopia, and the United Arab Emirates – in issuing a
statement expressing “grave concern” at the escalation of violence in the Gaza Strip
and calling for an immediate ceasefire.
“India sometimes
sees the UN resolutions as being too strict, because it has a good relationship
with Israel, but sometimes sides with Palestinians” as it seeks to cast itself
as a champion of developing nations amid stiff competition with China for that
role, Blarel said.
While “Modi would
support a more public embrace of Israel,” the analyst said, he has also
invested in cultivating strategic relations with the Gulf Cooperation Council
(GCC), India’s largest regional-bloc trading partner.
Modi’s governing BJP lost its majority in the lower house of India’s parliament earlier this month, leaving it dependent on coalition allies to stay in power for the first time since coming to power a decade ago. Now more than ever, Blarel said, the BJP will have “to consider having good diplomatic relationships with all actors in the Middle East as one of its priorities”.